🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.